With the filing of State v Scruggs on February 23, the Gavels of the Public Defender’s Office picked up five points (brief and oral argument) and edged into first place for the first time this season. Their stay at the top lasted only a day, however, as the 10 points gained by Linder & Marsack (brief, oral argument, and favorable outcome in Voces De La Frontera v. Clarke) moved the Affirmed back into the lead.
These tables are derived from information contained in 71 Wisconsin Supreme Court decisions that were turned up in a Lexis search for decisions filed between September 1, 1989, and August 31, 1990. The total of 71 decisions does not include rulings arising from (1) disciplinary proceedings against lawyers and (2) various motions and petitions.
The tables are available as a complete set and by individual topic according to the subsets listed below.
Decisions Arranged by Vote Split
Frequency of Justices in the Majority
Distribution of Opinion Authorship
Frequency of Agreement Between Pairs of Justices
Average Time Between Oral Argument and Opinions Authored by Each Justice
Number of Oral Arguments Presented by Individual Firms and Agencies
 The total of 71 decisions does include State v. Johnson (87-1471-CR), filed January 18, 1990—a ruling on a motion for reconsideration. The process involved briefing and oral argument, and it resulted in a decision with substantial discussion.
With a brief and oral argument in State v. Mattox, the Gavels of the Public Defender's Office climbed to within three points of the league-leading Affirmed. Current standings … [Continue reading]
The Gavels of the Public Defender's Office earned five points (brief and oral argument) in State v. Allen, thereby gaining ground on the league-leading Affirmed, who were idle. Current standings … [Continue reading]
Early in the 2015-16 term, Justice Abrahamson expressed concern over two aspects of the court’s docket: (1) the meager number of cases scheduled, and (2) the large percentage of these cases that had arrived as per curiam decisions from the court of … [Continue reading]
The Fantasy League’s second season has opened with the Affirmed seizing the early lead. Foley and Lardner led the way with 10 points (brief, oral argument, and favorable decision in Regency West Apartments v. City of Racine), while Aiken & … [Continue reading]
Tuesday’s post on amicus briefs noted, among other things, the steady decline in the number of these briefs filed with the Wisconsin Supreme Court over the past several years—in contrast to the growing number at the United States Supreme Court. A … [Continue reading]
“The amicus growth spurt is significant and shows no sign of slowing down,” observed two professors at William & Mary Law School in a post titled “The Amicus Machine.” Writing about the United States Supreme Court, they furnished compelling … [Continue reading]
Expanded teams have been formed in anticipation of the law-firm Fantasy League’s second season (for details on the league and its new teams, click here). Periodic scoring updates will be posted beginning early in 2017. … [Continue reading]
During SCOWstats’s recent series of posts on the number of decisions filed by the supreme courts of Wisconsin and neighboring states, Victor Forberger kindly brought to my attention some interesting figures regarding the output of the Massachusetts … [Continue reading]